Should i buy a cheaper older (mid ot late 1960) car or a more expensive newer (late 1990s-early 2000) car?


comparing apples oranges. both fruit different. subaru same size mustang. newer vehicle has more safety features , better mileage. mustang being classic should held in different regard aren't made longer. mean don't make mid 60's cars longer. easy work on , parts plentiful number of sources. insurance available through specialty carriers limited use. have classic cars use newer truck daily driver. btw...the parts classics not expensive here think.

i've been looking car lately , i've caught myself looking @ maintained, late 1960 mustangs , 2000 subaru outbacks. cant decide on car should

pro/con list cool, input owners of both kinds of cars appreciated


Cars & Transportation Buying & Selling Next



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nissan Quest vans .. any bad reviews?

Volkswagen Beetle History, Mission, Strategy from 1930-1960 [need links]?

Short survey/interview questions for my English paper..plz help :)?