What has digital photography done to us?


@pawpoint: if know you're doing, know how film going turn out when expose it. don't have wait until see it. that's training about.

digital has made less critical of imagery: culture tend ignore bad technique more easily. tend ignore image well, because see literally billions of them in lifetime now. has given expectation of quicker turnaround - people think digital takes less time film, , part does.

find digital not film, colors not saturated , hues varied, camera, not digital in , of itself. not have dynamic range film (soon, on low end cameras.)

agree has made lazy. took trip on decided shoot film rather digital. because had 36 exposures per roll , 20 rolls of specific variety of film sure did pull out handheld meter , checked range in scene. knew picture then: shadows, midtones , highlights fall, , planned development process film. when using digital camera, shot, looked @ histogram, reshot according results. didn't worry anywhere near much.

think real difference people respected photography , photographs more when done in film because perception "anyone can this" not prevalent. perceived @ least craft requiring great skill. people think can buy digital camera , presto! professional photographers capable of shooting weddings, advertising , fashion no training @ all. digital cheapened perception of photographs - why pay when there billion of them out there. ruined stock business, that's sure.

i need sources find out goods , bads digital photography , compare analogue photography , old ways of photography... articles issue.. university homework!.. please me if know anything...


Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography Next



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nissan Quest vans .. any bad reviews?

Volkswagen Beetle History, Mission, Strategy from 1930-1960 [need links]?

Short survey/interview questions for my English paper..plz help :)?