Which of these two sculptures are nicer?


asking matter of taste.
prefer first one. don't second 1 @ all. way symmetric , therefore rather boring. pretty constant width of ribbon visually boring too. doesn't have energy.
first 1 has @ least more interesting surface , despite being simpler in design has more variation , dynamics.

don't base of either though. if want buy 1 might want think how change it. base should part of sculpture, not piece of plastic holds sculpture steady.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/contemporary-mother-pearl-sculpture-/120517022358?pt=uk_home_garden_decorative_accents_le#ht_2673wt_907

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/ebayisapi.dll?viewitem&item=270580517548&_trksid=p2759.l1259#ht_682wt_1133


Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Sculpture Next



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nissan Quest vans .. any bad reviews?

Volkswagen Beetle History, Mission, Strategy from 1930-1960 [need links]?

Short survey/interview questions for my English paper..plz help :)?